Showing posts with label sex desire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sex desire. Show all posts

Love, pleasure, duty: Why women have sex?

What makes a woman want to have sex? Is it physical attraction? Love? Loneliness? Jealousy? Boredom? Painful menstrual cramps?
Many women interviewed were having sex purely because they wanted the experience.

Many women interviewed were having sex purely because they wanted the experience.

It turns out that woman have sex for all of these reasons and more, and that their choices are not arbitrary; there may be evolutionary explanations at work.

Psychologists Cindy Meston and David Buss, both professors at the University of Texas at Austin, decided that the topic of "why women have sex" deserved a book of its own. They've woven scientific research together with a slew of women's voices in their new collaborative work, "Why Women Have Sex," published September 29 by Times Books.

"We do bring in men occasionally by way of contrast, but we wanted to focus exclusively on women so that the complexity of women's sexual psychology was not given the short shrift, so to speak," said Buss, a leading evolutionary psychologist.

The authors conducted a study from June 2006 to April 2009 that asked women whether they had ever had sex for one of 237 reasons, all of which had emerged in a previous study. About 1,000 women contributed their perspectives.

It turns out that women's reasons for having sex range from love to pure pleasure to a sense of duty to curiosity to curing a headache. Some women just want to please their partners, and others want an ego boost.

Research findings

Purposely made partner jealous?
31 percent women vs. 17 percent men have tried to evoke jealousy in a partner.
Had sex out of sense of duty?
84 percent wives vs. 64 percent husbands usually or always comply when a spouse wants sex but they don't.
Partner choice for casual sex?
63 percent of women prefer to have casual sex with a friend vs. 37 percent who prefer sex with a stranger.
Steal someone else's mate?
38 percent of women say they've "poached" someone for a short fling.

Buss said he found it surprising how dramatically and variably sexual experience seemed to influence women's feelings of self-esteem.

"Some sexual experiences that women in our study reported just had devastating effects and long-lasting negative effects on their feelings of self-worth," he said. "But then for others, their sexual experiences provided the soaring height of euphoria and made them feel alive and vibrant."

Meston said some 20-somethings defied the gender stereotypes that women should be more chaste than men and not sleep around as much.

"Many of the women were having sex purely because they wanted the experience, they wanted the adventure, they wanted to see what it was like to be with men of different ethnicities," she said. "Some women said they wanted more notches on the belt. They simply wanted to get rid of their virginity."

Some women have sex to make money, and not just in the conventional manner of prostitution. A woman from California who goes by "Natalie Dylan" garnered national attention this year with her campaign to sell her virginity and said in January that her top bid of $3.8 million came from a 39-year-old Australian.

There are more factors that influence a woman's sex drive than a man's, the authors said, and the factors that make men attractive to women -- personality, sense of humor, self-confidence, status -- are less important considerations for men when they are choosing women.

There is also evidence that sexual arousal is more complicated for women than for men, the authors report.

A study from Meston's lab showed a strong correlation between how erect a man's penis is and how aroused he says he is. By contrast, the link is much weaker between a woman's physical arousal (as measured inside her vagina) and the arousal she says she feels, the researchers found. This is why drugs to treat erectile dysfunction such as Viagra don't work as well in women, the authors said.

That makes sense from an evolutionary perspective, even though men and women may not consciously think about their choices that way, the authors said. If the goal of a man is to spread his genes, he would need to look for signs of fertility in a woman, which are historically associated with physical cues, Buss said.

"The adaptive problem that women have had to solve is not simply picking a man who is fertile but a man who perhaps will invest in her, a man who won't inflict costs on her, a man who might have good genes that could be conveyed to her children," he said.

In this context, women must also be more selective, because wrong choices can lead much higher costs than for men: pregnancy and child-rearing.

In studies, women have consistently shown preferences for men with symmetrical bodies, a subtle mark of genetic fitness and status, the book said. In fact, simply by smelling T-shirts that men had worn for two nights, women judged the odors of symmetrical men to be the most attractive, and the asymmetrical men's odors the least attractive, in one study.

Still, symmetry isn't everything, Meston and Buss said. They pointed to singer-songwriter Lyle Lovett as someone with other positive attributes, such as musical talent and personality, who has clearly done well with women despite asymmetrical features.

"Women are evaluating men on multiple attributes," Buss said.

Kissing also turns out to be more important for women than for men in some respects: In one study, 53 percent of men said they would have sex without kissing, but only 15 percent of women said they would even consider sex without smooching first, the book said. For women, kissing is "an emotional litmus test," the authors wrote.

The medicinal value of sex also comes into play for some women, the book said. Sex can help a woman relax and sleep better, and it can ease the pain of menstrual cramps and headaches -- and some survey participants cited these as reasons they've had sex.

A study from Rutgers University found that, during orgasm, women were able to tolerate 75 percent more pain. Though Meston has not studied the phenomenon in men, she said she would expect sex to have the same effects of reducing headaches and other pain.

The authors collected stories from 1,006 women from 46 states, eight Canadian provinces, three European countries and Australia, New Zealand, Israel and China. Participants came from a variety of ethnic and religious -- as well as non-religious -- backgrounds and socioeconomic statuses. About 80 percent of the women said they were in a relationship at the time, and 93 percent said they were predominantly or exclusively heterosexual.

The book also explores how women's perception of sex may change over time, according to whom they're with and whether they are married.

A 26-year-old heterosexual woman wrote, "When I was single, I had sex for my own personal pleasure. Now that I am married, I have sex to please my husband. My own pleasure doesn't seem as important as his. I believe he feels the same way."

Sexbots for Better Sex?


Is making love to a robot in your future? According to David N.L. Levy, author of Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relations, people will not only fulfill their every fantasy with sexbots someday, but may fall in love with their personal sex slaves, too. With computer power set to mimic humans in every way -- from movements to muscles to emotions to personality to voice -- Levy holds that the day will come when we will be unable to distinguish humanoid from human. He further predicts that many will eventually deem robot sex as better than sex with humans, given this virtual person's superior sexual techniques and ability to satisfy.

Seem too far fetched? Consider that Axis, a Japanese company, is already producing Honeydolls, life-size sexbots for men, making a hefty $7,000 per figurine. South Korean and Japanese rent-a-sex-doll services have, too, been successful thus far, acting as evidence that there will be a demand for such products.

So why do sexbots have such an all-the-rage potential? Levy will tell you that it's because:

* These robots offer "great sex on tap 24/7."

* Sexbots will light your sexual fire, combating boredom and guaranteeing adventure and opportunity.

* Robots make for great sex tutors.

* You no longer have to go to a prostitute for sexual pleasure and satisfaction. A robot will be more convincing than a sex worker at expressing virtual affection and other emotions affiliated with paid sex.

* You don't have to deal with the economic transaction of sex -- in other words, you can have sex without the "complications" of a relationship.

* You can engage in your every sexual desire, trying new practices and techniques.

* You don't have to worry about sexually transmitted infections.

Fair enough. Even if you don't agree that sexbots could eradicate diseases, snuff out the sex workers industry, fix sexual desire issues, etc., you have to admit that some of the aforementioned is conceivable if -- and this is a big IF -- humans eventually:

* Are able to get past the mental block that's going to arise during sex for many over the mere fact that they're getting busy with an android.

* No longer get turned on by the power dynamic and joy of degrading another human in paying for sex.

* Become satisfied with having soulless sex 100% of the time.

* Aren't concerned over how sexbots will impact their ability to be intimate on a number of levels with fellow humans.

* Don't get bored of their sexbots too.

I could keep poking holes in Levy's arguments...but what really irked me about Levy's sexbot vision is how "off" he is in how the genders will embrace these new lovers. If you read Levy's synthesis of his doctoral pursuits (his Ph.D. is in gender studies and artificial intelligence), he plays up on the old and tiring Mars/Venus attitudes of stark gender differences when it comes to motivations for sex, love, and intimacy. He holds that men will embrace sex with robots for the pure physical pleasure. On the other hand, women, motivated by the need for love when it comes to sex, will "want not only a personal demonstration of the robot's virtuoso lovemaking skills but also to feel the robot's virtual love for them." Levy also sees sex robots as encouraging men to explore their feelings of emotional attraction on a deeper level, while ladies could be taught how to achieve greater physical sexual pleasures.

With millions of women appreciating their vibrators as never before, Levy sees this as "sufficient proof that women will welcome malebots with open arms." (Or should he have said legs?) Apparently, gals will love their robot-induced Os even more than those derived from their vibrators because of their sexbot's love-making skills. I'm sure that my girlfriends would beg to differ...

Perhaps most amusing is Levy's belief that there will be very little social stigma in purchasing a sex robot. Given these gadgets will wipe out the commercial sex industry, including the health risks involved, he sees them as coveted as owning a Beamer. Furthermore, he finds it quite conceivable that we'll all turn into a bunch of nymphomaniacs, having more sex than we can ever imagine. He makes the claim that people will physically enjoy sex with androids since the "delight of orgasm will be the same." Ask practically anybody who has had amazing sex with another, and they will rarely tell you that their sex toy trumps lovemaking. I'm just not buying any of it.